One year follow-up of first head to head comparison of tacrolimus
and microemulsified cyclosporin shows excellent safety and efficacy
with tacrolimus
No significant differences in the incidence of post-transplant
diabetes mellitus in renal transplantation
LISBON (PORTUGAL), 9 (PRNewswire)
The first large head-to-head, European, multicentre study of 557
renal transplant patients compared the efficacy and safety of
tacrolimus triple therapy with cyclosporin-microemulsion
(CyA-ME)-based triple therapy.
The study revealed a significantly lower rate of acute rejection
in the tacrolimus arm (19.6% vs. 37.3%, pá0.001) and a lower
incidence of steroid-resistant acute rejection (9.4% vs. 21.0%,
pá0.001) within the first 6 month following transplantation.
Even at six-months the results show a trend in graft survival
(94.6% vs. 91.9%) in favour of the tacrolimus regimen. Tacrolimus
therapy was associated with a superior cardiovascular profile, such
as total cholesterol which was significantly lower in the tacrolimus
group.
At 10th congress of the European Society for Organ
Transplantation (ESOT), held in Lisbon, Professor B Kraemer,
Regensburg, Germany, presented the 1 year follow-up data of this
first head-to-head comparison of the cornerstone immunosuppressants
tacrolimus and cyclosporin microemulsion. The 1-year results confirm
the initial 6-month follow-up. The incidence of acute rejections in
the second follow-up period was 2.1% in the tacrolimus group and 7.1%
in the CyA-ME group.
Professor Kraemer highlighted some extremely interesting safety
features of these two regimens: with tacrolimus, the use of
anti-hyperlipidemic drugs was only 11.1% compared to 25.1% in the
CyA-ME group, the difference in the use of diuretics was also
striking, 9.4% in the tacrolimus group and 17.5% in the CyA-ME group.
With regards to glucose metabolism, the study confirmed that no
significant differences exist between tacrolimus and CyA-ME regarding
diabetogenicity.
During the initial 6months, the incidence of new onset
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) was not significantly
different between both treatment arms - 4.5% in the tacrolimus group
and 2.0% in the CyA-ME group. There was only one additional patient
in the tacrolimus group and 2 in the CyA-ME group that developed
diabetes between months 7-12. However, at one year, the use of
overall use of insulin was again similar (8.1% vs. 7.6%).
This low incidence of IDDM under tacrolimus has been a common
feature of recent studies. One of the largest studies ever conducted
involving 838 renal transplant patients treated with tacrolimus was
presented by Professor Y. Vanrenterghem, Leuven, Belgium. The overall
incidence of IDDM in patients receiving tacrolimus therapy was 4.5%.
In one of the treatment arms of the study, where steroids were
withdrawn, the incidence of IDDM was even lower (3.2%), highlighting
the diabetogenic potential of long-term steroid therapy.
Thus, the 1 year follow-up evaluation showed that
tacrolimus-based therapy is significantly more efficacious than
cyclosporin microemulsion in the prevention of acute rejection, and
is also associated with a superior safety profile with no significant
difference in the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.
Fujisawa GmbH is a subsidiary of Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co.,
Ltd., based in Osaka, Japan. Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is
among the world's top 30 pharmaceutical companies and employs over
8000 people in Japan, Europe, North America and Asia. Since its
launch of Prograf( in Japan in 1993, the first in the world, Fujisawa
has become one of the world's leading transplant and
immunosuppression companies.
Fujisawa plans to maintain its commitment to transplantation, and
is dedicated both to improving the results of solid-organ
transplantation and to ensuring the health and quality of life of
patients. Prograf( is currently available in nearly 50 countries and
forms the centrepiece of Fujisawa's continuing growth. Additional
information on Fujisawa GmbH can be found on the Company's Web site
at http://www.fujisawaeurope.com.
References
1. Vianello A, McKenna M, Tiffany T. A cost-effectiveness
analysis of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin-microemulsion following
kidney transplantation. Presented at the 10th European Society for
Organ Transplantation, Lisbon, 6-11 October 2001.
2. Sperschneider H, for the European Renal Transplantation Study
Group. A large, multicentre trial to compare the efficacy and safety
of tacrolimus with cyclosporine microemulsion following renal
transplantation. Transplant Proc 2001;33:1279-81.
Source: Fujisawa GmbH
Contact: Marité Cruz, Fujisawa GmbH, Munich, Germany, tel. +49 89
4544 2249, fax +49 89 434 129, marite.cruz@fujisawa.de
(38727)
|
()
10/09/16-51/01
"